Cheat Engine

Sohail__Saha · Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 5:12 am Post subject: How to use AOB option??

How to use this feature..>
[/img]

STN · Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 7:24 am Post subject:

The aob injection ? Oh its this new template in CE 6.4 just like the code injection template but instead for aobscans.

Just give the address where you want to jump from your code, a name for the aobscan found address (game code) and CE takes cares of the rest. It was requested a lot and i am so glad to see DB finally made it.

I find the bytes it grabs for aobscan are not sufficient enough to be unique (it only grabs 6 bytes) but thats because i like my signatures(or aobs as some people call it) to be lengthier. You can easily copy paste more bytes though so i am not complaining. The writing of alloc/aobscan() was tiring in previous versions and this template takes care of that nicely.

Sohail__Saha · Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:11 pm Post subject:

Can you give an example Question

justa_dude · Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:42 pm Post subject:

++METHOS · Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:48 pm Post subject:

Yes, they are unique in 6.4.

STN · Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 1:20 pm Post subject:

I can bet my ex-girlfriends crabs ridden snatch on it that i am 100% right.

I highly doubt there are any internal routines that checked for and generated unique aobscans but if there are, thats a big fail on DB's part because they are dumb as shit

This is a sample aob CE generated
E8 7A F6 FF FF 90

translates to
call 00418960

Another sample one it generated
48 8B 88 A0 00 00 00 8B 47

translates to
mov rcx,[rax+000000A0]

I just find it very offensive when someone tries to insult my intelligence. I mean i have written a tutorial on signatures way before they were known around these parts as aobs
http://deviatedhacking.com/index.php/topic/197-how-to-update-your-trainers-real-quick-and-easy/

So i know a unique signature and a poor one when i see one and so far CE hasn't generated a good enough one yet but thats because its just a template and no internal check or that shit is done.

I just wish people would stop speaking from their assess but i also wish for a lot of things and none come true, like my girl would let me do that thing but alas, that is only ever going to happen in my imagination or there were no taxes...ah the list goes on and on.

Now to go back to the thread:
@Sohail__Saha: Do you even know aob/signature scanning is ? if you don't give that thread i linked a read, once you understand what it is then you will easily understand what the function does.[/b]

++METHOS · Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:36 pm Post subject:

justa_dude · Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:10 pm Post subject:

STN · Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 3:28 pm Post subject:

I gave an example in my post already

This is a sample aob CE generated
E8 7A F6 FF FF 90

translates to
call 00418960

So yeah maybe there are checks but my second part still stands. Dumb as shit. But its alright because it is a tool and has no brain.

I am not going to argue anymore if you think that is unique because then apparently we seem to working on a completely different level, the retarded and the smart level and you know which level you are on.

I have been once told by DB that i can be a prick/asshole and since this was a direct attack on a statement i made, i am using that right. Fuck off dumb shit

mgr.inz.Player · Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 5:46 pm Post subject:

It is still useful feature. I myself unconsciously choose most suitable injection point. So, not on "calls", not at the end of function ("pop ebp; ret").

In many cases it is accurate. At least for me.

justa_dude · Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:29 pm Post subject:

Sohail__Saha · Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:27 am Post subject:

Guys, stop quarrelling. And by the way, can I change a value immediately with AOBS?? ( I hope not )

STN · Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:26 pm Post subject:

mgr.inz.Player · Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:38 pm Post subject:

STN · Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:06 pm Post subject: