View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
teeigeryuh Master Cheater Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 261 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:01 am Post subject: le amd |
|
|
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paupav Master Cheater Reputation: 13
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 315 Location: P. Sherman 42, Wallaby Way, Sydney
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:19 am Post subject: Re: le amd |
|
|
teeigeryuh wrote: | |
Is this good or bad?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh Master Cheater Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 261 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
its good imo
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gogodr I post too much Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2041
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daniel. I post too much Reputation: 72
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 |
My guess is that's bad
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma Member of the Year Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 |
And also the same score as the 8350, which leads me to believe that the test only accounts for quad cores.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh Master Cheater Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 261 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 | so just because a cpu with a lower clock beats it then the cpu is instantly "bad"
great logic gogodr
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Up2Admin I'm a spammer Reputation: 126
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 6546 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
teeigeryuh wrote: | gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 | so just because a cpu with a lower clock beats it then the cpu is instantly "bad"
great logic gogodr | I can understand the logic. Why is he wrong?
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma Member of the Year Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Up2Admin wrote: | teeigeryuh wrote: | gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 | so just because a cpu with a lower clock beats it then the cpu is instantly "bad"
great logic gogodr | I can understand the logic. Why is he wrong? |
why do you bother
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Up2Admin I'm a spammer Reputation: 126
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 6546 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cryoma wrote: | Up2Admin wrote: | teeigeryuh wrote: | gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 | so just because a cpu with a lower clock beats it then the cpu is instantly "bad"
great logic gogodr | I can understand the logic. Why is he wrong? |
why do you bother | Because I have nothing better to do.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh Master Cheater Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 261 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you're literally comparing another a cpu on a wayyyy different price range
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Up2Admin I'm a spammer Reputation: 126
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 6546 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
teeigeryuh wrote: | you're literally comparing another a cpu on a wayyyy different price range | Probably because it's a mobile processor. Which makes things just as laughable.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma Member of the Year Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Up2Admin wrote: | Cryoma wrote: | Up2Admin wrote: | teeigeryuh wrote: | gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 | so just because a cpu with a lower clock beats it then the cpu is instantly "bad"
great logic gogodr | I can understand the logic. Why is he wrong? |
why do you bother | Because I have nothing better to do. |
Go draw dammit.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Up2Admin I'm a spammer Reputation: 126
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 6546 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cryoma wrote: | Up2Admin wrote: | Cryoma wrote: | Up2Admin wrote: | teeigeryuh wrote: | gogodr wrote: | it is good?
it shows that a six core AMD at 4.3GHz runs almost the same as an i7 at 2.6 | so just because a cpu with a lower clock beats it then the cpu is instantly "bad"
great logic gogodr | I can understand the logic. Why is he wrong? |
why do you bother | Because I have nothing better to do. |
Go draw dammit. | I've got artist's block.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh Master Cheater Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 261 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Up2Admin wrote: | teeigeryuh wrote: | you're literally comparing another a cpu on a wayyyy different price range | Probably because it's a mobile processor. Which makes things just as laughable. |
You're comparing ghz which makes it even more laughable
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|