| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sephiron
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 34
Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 292
Location: JAPAN circa 1653, fucking some seagulls
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
 Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:33 pm Post subject: Re: So, this computer build |
  |
|
......
4 pin aux and 24 pin mobo. 99.99% of psus have them.
Oh, and 2 6pin cables too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't. |
k then just get like i5-2500 & ur 560 which is around $400 if you insist on a quad, fuck amd
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't. |
k then just get like i5-2500 & ur 560 which is around $400 if you insist on a quad, fuck amd |
4170 = 140
2500 = 210
hardcore intel fanboy
He won't see a difference, just a 5% of FPS difference with them same graphics card, a huge performance difference on other apps tho.
Plus i5 3450 = 10 bucks cheaper than the 2500, faster and uses less power.
Last edited by Dark‮‮ on Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't. |
k then just get like i5-2500 & ur 560 which is around $400 if you insist on a quad, fuck amd |
4170 = 140
2500 = 210
hardcore intel fanboy |
140+140+100+15
or 210+140+50+20
also mfw getting like next level mobo for like shittiest components
my mobo was 95 and my gpu & cpu were 200+
only reason i didnt get like 3550 or 3450 is because h61 didnt work for my i5-3550 so i dont wanna risk it with you, ivy bridge isnt guaranteed on h61
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="cokefag"] | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't. |
k then just get like i5-2500 & ur 560 which is around $400 if you insist on a quad, fuck amd |
4170 = 140
2500 = 210
hardcore intel fanboy |
oh but you see, i pointed to 1.6ghz ram and a nice mobo.
in that case...
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4531833&sku=P56-3980
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1418809&sku=A455-3146
So ....
140+140+60+25
wooo
but the original asus mobo i pointed out will support piledriver
Which points to higher clocks and 10-20% better ipc.
I'd point op to a 2500k if he was to spend more
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Dark Bite"] | cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't. |
k then just get like i5-2500 & ur 560 which is around $400 if you insist on a quad, fuck amd |
4170 = 140
2500 = 210
hardcore intel fanboy |
oh but you see, i pointed to 1.6ghz ram and a nice mobo.
in that case...
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4531833&sku=P56-3980
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1418809&sku=A455-3146
So ....
140+140+60+25
wooo
but the original asus mobo i pointed out will support piledriver
Which points to higher clocks and 10-20% better ipc.
I'd point op to a 2500k if he was to spend more |
2x2gb ram sticks
why not just get 1 stick of 4 wtf
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="cokefag"] | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | Dark Bite wrote: | | cokefag wrote: |
so i3 is still better then?
that's also the one that's like a bit slower than the one i posted, but its ignorable
but really, if ur using for gaming, other than first 2 cores fuck it for budget and just get an i3 |
fx-4170 = 16% better than 4100
i3 2120 = 6% better than 2100
OH ALSO
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
fx-4170 = 4609
i3 2120 = 4218
The fx is unlocked, the i3 isn't. |
k then just get like i5-2500 & ur 560 which is around $400 if you insist on a quad, fuck amd |
4170 = 140
2500 = 210
hardcore intel fanboy |
oh but you see, i pointed to 1.6ghz ram and a nice mobo.
in that case...
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=4531833&sku=P56-3980
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1418809&sku=A455-3146
So ....
140+140+60+25
wooo
but the original asus mobo i pointed out will support piledriver
Which points to higher clocks and 10-20% better ipc.
I'd point op to a 2500k if he was to spend more |
2x2gb ram sticks
why not just get 1 stick of 4 wtf |
It'd most likely be bottlenecking the cpu.
cough cough
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/309240-30-battlefield
Someone who's not using his full 4gb and fixed by upgrading it, was most likely getting bottlenecked.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SFP+
Comp. talk moderator
 Reputation: 26
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1228
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Idgaf if AMD beats intel in what you get for the money, I'd rather wait and spend a little more and get the stability from Intel. Past experiences say no to AMD and that's how it'll stay.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Safko wrote: | | Idgaf if AMD beats intel in what you get for the money, I'd rather wait and spend a little more and get the stability from Intel. Past experiences say no to AMD and that's how it'll stay. |
inb4 hero comes and circlejerk amd everywhere
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dark‮‮
Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Location: <3
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Safko wrote: | | Idgaf if AMD beats intel in what you get for the money, I'd rather wait and spend a little more and get the stability from Intel. Past experiences say no to AMD and that's how it'll stay. |
But he isn't into spending more, especially when he won't see the difference.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
