| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Channel GannoK
pffrt
 Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:22 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
a good, logical hypothesis uses if then because.
I can't answer this question with a logical response if the question can't even relate to an actual hypothesis.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 50
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GannoK wrote: | a good, logical hypothesis uses if then because.
I can't answer this question with a logical response if the question can't even relate to an actual hypothesis. |
>Good
Just present the hypothesis, your theory, then state why your theory may be right you fucking scrub.
| gogodr wrote: | | Aviar³ wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | GannoK wrote: | should know that a hypothesis(for science, in my ecology class for this case) is answered with the "If/then/because" formula.
well my ecology teacher is a fucking dumbass and probably doesnt even know anything about science in the first place.
she wants us to make a hypothesis about this statement : "HOW can plants and animals survive in a closed system?
you can't write a legitimate hypothesis, with this statement. please help me kill my teacher, then myself. |
hypothesis : plants and animals will survive in a closed system
elaborate on the hypothesis with your if then because shit that makes no sense in algorithm creation and prove or disprove the hypothesis. |
What the? |
wat |
Que?
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pourquoi
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
br0l0ck
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if the plants are in an enclosed environment then x because y
wow because using the word how fucks everything up
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
 Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aviar³ wrote: | | GannoK wrote: | a good, logical hypothesis uses if then because.
I can't answer this question with a logical response if the question can't even relate to an actual hypothesis. |
>Good
Just present the hypothesis, your theory, then state why your theory may be right you fucking scrub.
| gogodr wrote: | | Aviar³ wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | GannoK wrote: | should know that a hypothesis(for science, in my ecology class for this case) is answered with the "If/then/because" formula.
well my ecology teacher is a fucking dumbass and probably doesnt even know anything about science in the first place.
she wants us to make a hypothesis about this statement : "HOW can plants and animals survive in a closed system?
you can't write a legitimate hypothesis, with this statement. please help me kill my teacher, then myself. |
hypothesis : plants and animals will survive in a closed system
elaborate on the hypothesis with your if then because shit that makes no sense in algorithm creation and prove or disprove the hypothesis. |
What the? |
wat |
Que? |
Como?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | Aviar³ wrote: | | GannoK wrote: | a good, logical hypothesis uses if then because.
I can't answer this question with a logical response if the question can't even relate to an actual hypothesis. |
>Good
Just present the hypothesis, your theory, then state why your theory may be right you fucking scrub.
| gogodr wrote: | | Aviar³ wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | GannoK wrote: | should know that a hypothesis(for science, in my ecology class for this case) is answered with the "If/then/because" formula.
well my ecology teacher is a fucking dumbass and probably doesnt even know anything about science in the first place.
she wants us to make a hypothesis about this statement : "HOW can plants and animals survive in a closed system?
you can't write a legitimate hypothesis, with this statement. please help me kill my teacher, then myself. |
hypothesis : plants and animals will survive in a closed system
elaborate on the hypothesis with your if then because shit that makes no sense in algorithm creation and prove or disprove the hypothesis. |
What the? |
wat |
Que? |
Como? |
どのようか.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma
Member of the Year
![]() Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That is Susan Hewitt, she writes for wikipedia.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
