| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
akinos
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 534
Location: St-Low
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Nice
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wintermoot
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 198
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mrkrishan wrote: | when is tommorow  |
I agree with mrkrishan, it has been tomorrow for too long now...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nog_lorp
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 743
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
No real point in using __asm like that, just makes it less readable.
You might, however, want to make it more readable using a __declspec(naked) function and memcpy'ing it.
For example,
| Code: |
void __declspec(naked) Swear_Enable() {
__asm {
nop
nop
}
}
char Swear_Disable[32];
int main()
{
void *ptr = 0046f0aa;
//enable
memcpy(Swear_Disable, ptr, 2);
memcpy(ptr, Swear_Enable, 2);
//disable
memcpy(ptr, Swear_Disable, 2);
return 0;
}
|
This will make it much nicer when working with big complicated hacks that you are actually developing instead of cut&pasting  .
~nog_lorp
_________________
Mutilated lips give a kiss on the wrist of the worm-like tips of tentacles expanding in my mind
I'm fine accepting only fresh brine you can get another drop of this yeah you wish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
atom0s
Moderator
 Reputation: 205
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 8588
Location: 127.0.0.1
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Uh.. norg what you posted is a console app. Naked functions and memcpy only work (directly) in another process if injected.
_________________
- Retired. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nog_lorp
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 743
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Meh, ignore the int main then, that was just to stop people from putting code in static context. Pretend it's in your dllmain or some thread it makes.
BTW, if you wanna be cool use MessageBoxW since MessageBoxA is just a wrapper to MessageBoxW (Well, its actually: MessageBoxA calls MessageBoxExA calls MessageBoxTimeoutA calls MessageBoxTimeoutW). In general, calling W functions removes a call or two and some conversion. Meanwhile, ASCII is more compact then UNICODE. So there is a slight size tradeoff (negligible) vs a pretty significant speed tradeoff.
_________________
Mutilated lips give a kiss on the wrist of the worm-like tips of tentacles expanding in my mind
I'm fine accepting only fresh brine you can get another drop of this yeah you wish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
中国&
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Posts: 34
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: THANK YOU |
|
|
THANK YOU
just what i needed
=D
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igoticecream
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 1807
Location: 0x00400000
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:53 pm Post subject: Re: [TUT][v1] DLL's |
|
|
at the "*(DWORD*)address = 0x9090" part... isn't WORD? you are writting 2 bytes so...
_________________
+~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
