Cheat Engine Forum Index Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Got 2 new oldtoys n.n
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Random spam
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
[SPW]Killamoocow
Master Cheater
Reputation: 30

Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 439
Location: Secret Cow Level

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

new 2 him old over all?
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125

Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes because its relative and I'm taking new old toys with new and old in diferent concepts of the toys
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Blank
I post too much
Reputation: 1

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 3044

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SirGodlike wrote:
gogodr wrote:
SirGodlike wrote:
gogodr wrote:
new because I just bought them but they were made long time ago

They are old, not new.

my new oldtoys

That's a very ambiguous concept.
Something can't be old and new at the same time.


Obvious old toys are.... new.
...
X/0

Well. I get it.

Its like when someone here posts something old saying its new. Then everyone is like 'wtf old shit niggacopter.' but it was new to you. New old lulz.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SGL
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 14

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gogodr wrote:
yes because its relative and I'm taking new old toys with new and old in diferent concepts of the toys

You can't qualify a concept.
You qualify objects.

_________________
I'm SirGodlike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50

Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

New and old are relative and abstract concepts. Something old can be new to someone else.
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SGL
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 14

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aviar wrote:
New and old are relative and abstract concepts. Something old can be new to someone else.

Well, yes.
It's new to him.
And it can be old to someone else.
But it can't be both.

_________________
I'm SirGodlike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
[SPW]Killamoocow
Master Cheater
Reputation: 30

Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 439
Location: Secret Cow Level

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

y not?
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50

Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you refrence two different parts yes. Its an old object (refrence age) that is new to him (refrence familiarity).
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SGL
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 14

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Killamoocow wrote:
y not?

Because it's called common sense.

_________________
I'm SirGodlike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50

Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aviar wrote:
If you refrence two different parts yes. Its an old object (refrence age) that is new to him (refrence familiarity).

_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125

Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just bought them so them are my new toys but I know they were made long time ago so they are old
old toys
so new oldtoys
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
SGL
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 14

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aviar wrote:
Aviar wrote:
If you refrence two different parts yes. Its an old object (refrence age) that is new to him (refrence familiarity).

Age is not an object.
Nor is familiarity.

_________________
I'm SirGodlike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50

Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No shit. Your refrencing a characteristic of the object in question.
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SGL
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 14

Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 758

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aviar wrote:
No shit. Your refrencing a characteristic of the object in question.

You can't qualify a quality.
It's like freezing the antartica.

_________________
I'm SirGodlike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125

Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SirGodlike wrote:
Aviar wrote:
No shit. Your refrencing a characteristic of the object in question.

You can't qualify a quality.
It's like freezing the antartica.

Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Random spam All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

CE Wiki   IRC (#CEF)   Twitter
Third party websites