| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
spyder_21
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 36
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:02 pm Post subject: What is the best Trainer Maker Program out there? |
 |
|
Well the topic speaks for itself, so what is the best TMP out there aside from coding the entire thing yourself.
I know Cheat Engine trainer lacks a lot, would be sweet if it gets updated with button options and extended features (custom buttons,background image).
I have tried TMK (which is nice, but lacks the pointer function), and have tried GTS 2.0 (Which I can't get the pointer function to work on that).
I have the pointer function working on CE, and it works perfect for address that change every time you restart the game,but CE trainer options/features falls short.
Thank You,
spyder_21
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nejisucks
How do I cheat?
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dude,cheat engine's trainer maker is da best... 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spyder_21
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 36
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it is good, just really limited
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Special11
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 28
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yep very good but multi-level pointers fails with ce trainer maker :/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Radiation
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 14
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 842
Location: Chernobyl
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, not with the beta one... i don't think so...
also, if you want to make your trainers, start off with something easy like visual basic 6.0
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Psy
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 1366
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GTS is good (game trainer studio). Nice options with very small compiled .exe size (due to ASM). But in all honesty, coding it yourself is the better option, even if it's plain easy VB (you can do more than what most think in the language).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Snow1337
Catastrophic Cheatah
 Reputation: 1
Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 183
Location: Your, Computer
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Psy wrote: | | GTS is good (game trainer studio). Nice options with very small compiled .exe size (due to ASM). But in all honesty, coding it yourself is the better option, even if it's plain easy VB (you can do more than what most think in the language). |
this
I use VB, but used to use GTS
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spyder_21
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 36
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I will have to try out VB, is VB coding anything like AutoIt coding?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
La_Tortuga
How do I cheat?
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Location: North Carolina
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="itapa"]no, not with the beta one... i don't think so...
also, if you want to make your trainers, start off with something easy like visual basic 6.0[/quote]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| La_Tortuga wrote: | | also, if you want to make your trainers, start off with something easy like visual basic 6.0 |
this is dumb, VB6 has no support, it's a dead language.
| spyder_21 wrote: | | I will have to try out VB, is VB coding anything like AutoIt coding? |
don't use VB, go with C#. anyone who suggest VB is clueless.
C# is a better language in every conceivable way. much more elegance with all the "easy" you want.
http://www.microsoft.com/express/Downloads/#2008-Visual-CS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Psy
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 1366
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| slovach wrote: | | don't use VB, go with C#. anyone who suggest VB is clueless. |
I hope you're not suggesting that i'm clueless?! Lol. I use C++ now and would never use anything else. However, I initially used VB, when doing my earliest trainers and many people have found it to be the easiest route to go to start producing their own stuff, hence my mere mention of the language. No-one I know who started gamehacking with no prior coding knowledge took several months out to learn enough C++, learn about Win32API or MFC for the GUI and went on to do it. It's just not seen as worth it for the odd trainer release. Chill out with the harsh replies bud.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're amazingly thin-skinned if you think my opinion was harsh.
If one wants to do something involving programming as a hobby without investing work, well, it isn't going to work. What do you expect? It really doesn't matter what language someone starts out with... but doesn't it make sense to learn with a sane, modern one? VB has no purpose in existing outside of whatever horrible legacy garbage it's supporting.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
False Prophet
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: -1
Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 121
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slovach wrote: | You're amazingly thin-skinned if you think my opinion was harsh.
If one wants to do something involving programming as a hobby without investing work, well, it isn't going to work. What do you expect? It really doesn't matter what language someone starts out with... but doesn't it make sense to learn with a sane, modern one? VB has no purpose in existing outside of whatever horrible legacy garbage it's supporting. |
Slovach, you should stop flaming VB6 so much. You of all people should know that a good portion of the CEF goers won't ever stick with C#. They'll try it out, find that it's hard and boring then quit. Why not interest them in a RAD language to peak their interest? Then when they are ready they can move on to something else. Such as one of the C languages.
Honestly, a lot of people start with a BASIC language and move up when they can't accomplish what they need with it.
I'll wager you started with a BASIC language.
And by the way, a hobbyist programmer can throw any amount of work into their program in any amount of time. Just because they program as a hobby does not mean that they are bad programmers who can't do squat with their language. I don't know why you threw that opinion in there. A lot of us are hobbyist's who work during the day and find it fun to write programs.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oggy wrote: | | slovach wrote: | You're amazingly thin-skinned if you think my opinion was harsh.
If one wants to do something involving programming as a hobby without investing work, well, it isn't going to work. What do you expect? It really doesn't matter what language someone starts out with... but doesn't it make sense to learn with a sane, modern one? VB has no purpose in existing outside of whatever horrible legacy garbage it's supporting. |
Slovach, you should stop flaming VB6 so much. You of all people should know that a good portion of the CEF goers won't ever stick with C#. They'll try it out, find that it's hard and boring then quit. Why not interest them in a RAD language to peak their interest? Then when they are ready they can move on to something else. Such as one of the C languages.
Honestly, a lot of people start with a BASIC language and move up when they can't accomplish what they need with it.
I'll wager you started with a BASIC language.
And by the way, a hobbyist programmer can throw any amount of work into their program in any amount of time. Just because they program as a hobby does not mean that they are bad programmers who can't do squat with their language. I don't know why you threw that opinion in there. A lot of us are hobbyist's who work during the day and find it fun to write programs. |
VB6 is a dead language, there is no point to using it. There is no support for it any more, get over it.
C# is a RAD language, you've obviously confused it with something else. (Hint: it's a far cry from C/C++) C# has far more support than VB.NET does within it's circles did I mention that sharp developers are often paid better?
But I guess nice job trying to argue against something when you don't know what it is, so you're basically propagating nonsense.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deviledegg24
How do I cheat?
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 23 Jan 2010
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There isn't a huge difference between VB.Net and C# .Net - they offer very similar capabilities with somewhat different language structure and naming. C# currently is somewhat more popular, but either make a good choice - VB.Net may be easier if programmers have had prior experience with VB 6.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
