Cheat Engine

Dark Byte · Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:34 am Post subject:

I did some looking up and with luck the value 160 should work for win2k (you can fill it in and then press ok in the kerneldata gatherer)

processnameoffset and debugport offset arn't required, but will prevent the processwatcher from giving you the proper names

trew01 · Newbie cheater Reputation: 0 Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 11

wow you rule! that worked i set it to 160 like you said then turned on stealth and it diddnt crash. you should make a note of this for future users with this problem.

i thank you again for all your time and effort you put into me. i greatly appriciate it and on thursday you will get my donation and if i can get this to work on psobb i will certainly keep donating as i use it.

trew01 · Newbie cheater Reputation: 0 Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 11

has there been another way to bypass gg or NP without being detected using this progy? i read about it alot and have tried to do what the tutorials have said. it still detects a cheat and quits the game.

Dark Byte · Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:37 am Post subject:

Perhaps, but I havn't heard of any yet

acrevv23 · How do I cheat? Reputation: 0 Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 2

I have heard of a way to bypass gg, but im not sure excatly how to do it... this is all I know so far: The new patch detects when game gaurd is closed by CE, so now I have to figure out a way for CE not to crash that proccess (gg).

If you can figure this out then you can once again bypass gg (after gg was patched the old method does not work anymore). Im still trying to figure it out, but nothing so far Sad

Dark Byte · Posted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:50 pm Post subject:

One problem with this is that ce doesn't close gameguard

acrevv23 · How do I cheat? Reputation: 0 Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 2

Edit: nm figured it out Very Happy