| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ElJEffro
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1881
Location: La Tierra
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:28 pm Post subject: [Release] Pixel Analyzer |
 |
|
Safko: This topic has gone far out of hand, locked.
This is in C#, but I used the GetDC() and GetPixel() APIs. If you want to create a pixel-based macro/bot I find this much easier than writing code to check several possible pixel locations and return values.
It should look like this :
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flyte
Peanuts!!!!
 Reputation: 6
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 1887
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This has already been done, in a far better, less .NET dependent version.
http://colorcop.net/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
&Vage
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 1053
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Flyte wrote: | This has already been done, in a far better, less .NET dependent version.
http://colorcop.net/ |
He's just showing what he has made, he isn't bragging about it. Cut him some slack 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ElJEffro
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1881
Location: La Tierra
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aw figures that my ideas have already been done
I probably could have made this in C++ but it wouldn't have looked as nice 
hopefully someone will find a use for this 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Flyte
Peanuts!!!!
Reputation: 6
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 1887
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| _void_ wrote: | | Flyte wrote: | This has already been done, in a far better, less .NET dependent version.
http://colorcop.net/ |
He's just showing what he has made, he isn't bragging about it. Cut him some slack |
It isn't anything personal against him, I just hate .NET 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HolyBlah
Master Cheater
![]() Reputation: 2
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 446
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Crash after 10 secounds.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DeletedUser14087
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 2
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 3069
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
.NET provides low-memory programmers with finished programs components, shame...
in .NET, they provide you to kill a process within 1 line, and much more..
guess what they will release in .NET 4.0, a 1 click complete personal OS.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Symbol
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 5094
Location: Israel.
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rot1 wrote: | .NET provides low-memory programmers with finished programs components, shame...
in .NET, they provide you to kill a process within 1 line, and much more.. |
What's wrong with that?
Just because it's 1 line, doesn't mean it's faster or more efficient, in fact it's slower, more calls, .NET functions eventually call the Win32 APIs, after a lot of calls.
And just because you can drag buttons to your window and design your window easily doesn't mean .NET sucks, it's just to help doing things faster, a programmer is not someone who can call an API in 100 lines or 1 lines, anybody can call an API, the fact you did it in C# or C++ doesn't make you a better or worse programmer, just the way you did it was shorter/longer.
I don't like .NET either, but not because you can do everything so quickly, because you don't have much access to the memory, it throws an exception even when you type cast something, you can't call APIs directly unless you import them and some more, but not because anything is being done quickly.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rot1 wrote: | .NET provides low-memory programmers with finished programs components, shame...
in .NET, they provide you to kill a process within 1 line, and much more..
guess what they will release in .NET 4.0, a 1 click complete personal OS. |
Why would you expect anything else? That's the idea behind it, it's supposed to be a RAD language.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DeletedUser14087
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 2
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 3069
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But they should get used to it themselves like every starter, cause for example:
we have a professional programmer who provides beginners with wrappers and components and tons of shortcuts, while he's working his ass out and the other dude just drags and drops components, what's the idea behind it ?
they should at least make wrappers themselves though, and .NET takes shitload of time to load.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HolyBlah
Master Cheater
![]() Reputation: 2
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 446
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rot1 wrote: | But they should get used to it themselves like every starter, cause for example:
we have a professional programmer who provides beginners with wrappers and components and tons of shortcuts, while he's working his ass out and the other dude just drags and drops components, what's the idea behind it ?
they should at least make wrappers themselves though, and .NET takes shitload of time to load. |
So we shouldn't use the header's that was made by some professional programmer who worked his ass out, like windows.h or iostream.h.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hcavolsdsadgadsg
I'm a spammer
![]() Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 5801
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rot1 wrote: | But they should get used to it themselves like every starter, cause for example:
we have a professional programmer who provides beginners with wrappers and components and tons of shortcuts, while he's working his ass out and the other dude just drags and drops components, what's the idea behind it ?
they should at least make wrappers themselves though, and .NET takes shitload of time to load. |
What don't you get? Time isn't free.
For example, C# is becoming very popular with games. Sure, the engine itself is still likely to be in C++/ASM, but such a language only helps in completion of mundane tasks and getting a toolset together quickly.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rapion124
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 1095
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| C# and other RAD languages like Delphi and VB are meant for the GUI design part. For example, would you rather spend 5 hours writing the logic of your program, or writing tens of CreateWindowEx() statements?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma
Member of the Year
![]() Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd rather be fiddling with gravity._y=-5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Overload
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 08 Feb 2008
Posts: 293
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cryoma wrote: | | I'd rather be fiddling with gravity._y=-5 |
AS is totally irrelivent 
_________________
Blog
| Quote: | Rhys says:
you can be my maid
Rhys says:
ill buy you a french maid outfit
Tyler says:
Sounds good
Rhys says:
ill hold you to that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
